Speak to a Lawyer Immediately - Free Consultation - 1-800-840-2111
Archive for August, 2010
Last week, the Yaz MDL court sided with Bayor and ruled that third-party claims against the drug maker were too remote to justify sufficient injury necessary for standing. According to the brief, the plaintiffs argued that anyone who “purchased, reimbursed, and/or paid for all or part of the cost of YAZ” should be able to sue the drug’s parent company Bayer because it engaged in “fraudulent, misleading, and unlawful advertising campaign that wrongfully promoted YAZ as safe and effective for unapproved off-label uses and concelaed or omitted facts pertaining to YAZ’s safety profile.”
Why Contact Our Firm?
With over $150 Million recovered from major drug, medical device, and medical malpractice cases in the last five years alone, our attorneys are rated among the best in California by our peers.
We take cases on a contingency basis, meaning we are only paid if we win or settle your case, and consultations are ALWAYS free.
Learn More About Us »